What would YOU like to play or run? (Interest Catch-all)

[Leitz]

My plan is different. I'm in scarik's BX/Chainmail game and enjoying the heck out of his Hauberk rule set. While the core mechanics are a blend of BX and the actual "Chainmail", he's refining the rules as we encounter new situations. I'm sharing my working through the "Write Your First Adventure" course and building a module to introduce the Hauberk rules in a basic adventure that leaves options open for a later campaign.

[Rex]

I figured that, but they were actually both written for Holmes Basic, or possibly even OD&D in the case of B1. In my experience both get used with 1e just as much as Moldvay. Which just shows how interchangeable the systems really are.

[Rex]

My plan is different. I'm in scarik's BX/Chainmail game and enjoying the heck out of his Hauberk rule set. While the core mechanics are a blend of BX and the actual "Chainmail", he's refining the rules as we encounter new situations. I'm sharing my working through the "Write Your First Adventure" course and building a module to introduce the Hauberk rules in a basic adventure that leaves options open for a later campaign.

Cool Leitz. It will be interesting to see when you are done. I have been following your thread on it, just haven't commented on it yet.

[Leitz]

My plan is different. I'm in scarik's BX/Chainmail game and enjoying the heck out of his Hauberk rule set. While the core mechanics are a blend of BX and the actual "Chainmail", he's refining the rules as we encounter new situations. I'm sharing my working through the "Write Your First Adventure" course and building a module to introduce the Hauberk rules in a basic adventure that leaves options open for a later campaign.

Cool Leitz. It will be interesting to see when you are done. I have been following your thread on it, just haven't commented on it yet.

I should have the module in text draft in a couple of weeks; if you're interested in giving feedback, let me know and I'll send you a copy. I'll have some questions to be answered, things like "If you were a player, what would you enjoy about this scenario?" and "If you were the DM, what would you like added, clarified, or removed so you could run it well?"

[Edeldhur]

I figured that, but they were actually both written for Holmes Basic, or possibly even OD&D in the case of B1. In my experience both get used with 1e just as much as Moldvay. Which just shows how interchangeable the systems really are.

Yeah I know you did
And very true!

[Edeldhur]

My plan is different. I'm in scarik's BX/Chainmail game and enjoying the heck out of his Hauberk rule set. While the core mechanics are a blend of BX and the actual "Chainmail", he's refining the rules as we encounter new situations. I'm sharing my working through the "Write Your First Adventure" course and building a module to introduce the Hauberk rules in a basic adventure that leaves options open for a later campaign.

I have heard great things about it!
Earlier in my presence here in the US forums I joined the game, but I think I got a bit overwhelmed, and ended up bowing out. I do regret it though.
I was really green into what OD&D is/was, and it all seemed very confusing at the time.
I am a much better person now, and been actually reading the LBB recently

[Leitz]

My plan is different. I'm in scarik's BX/Chainmail game and enjoying the heck out of his Hauberk rule set. While the core mechanics are a blend of BX and the actual "Chainmail", he's refining the rules as we encounter new situations. I'm sharing my working through the "Write Your First Adventure" course and building a module to introduce the Hauberk rules in a basic adventure that leaves options open for a later campaign.

I have heard great things about it!
Earlier in my presence here in the US forums I joined the game, but I think I got a bit overwhelmed, and ended up bowing out. I do regret it though.
I was really green into what OD&D is/was, and it all seemed very confusing at the time.
I am a much better person now, and been actually reading the LBB recently

I owe you an apology; you were in the game early on and I didn't interact well. Our characters got along great, but I had a game mindset based on another game scarik ran years ago. In that game my character was a driven planner with lots of big goals, and I came into this one effectively as an extension of the old game. That's why the group structure was such an issue for me, and I didn't handle that conversation well.

I'm sorry.

[Edeldhur]

My plan is different. I'm in scarik's BX/Chainmail game and enjoying the heck out of his Hauberk rule set. While the core mechanics are a blend of BX and the actual "Chainmail", he's refining the rules as we encounter new situations. I'm sharing my working through the "Write Your First Adventure" course and building a module to introduce the Hauberk rules in a basic adventure that leaves options open for a later campaign.

I have heard great things about it!
Earlier in my presence here in the US forums I joined the game, but I think I got a bit overwhelmed, and ended up bowing out. I do regret it though.
I was really green into what OD&D is/was, and it all seemed very confusing at the time.
I am a much better person now, and been actually reading the LBB recently

I owe you an apology; you were in the game early on and I didn't interact well. Our characters got along great, but I had a game mindset based on another game scarik ran years ago. In that game my character was a driven planner with lots of big goals, and I came into this one effectively as an extension of the old game. That's why the group structure was such an issue for me, and I didn't handle that conversation well.

I'm sorry.

I really do not remember us having anything else apart from a nice, cool interaction

[GreyWolfVT]

I was in that game as well and left as well I was overwhelmed and other interactions did not go well so I bowed out of it and have avoided any chainmail games since.

[Leitz]

I was in that game as well and left as well I was overwhelmed and other interactions did not go well so I bowed out of it and have avoided any chainmail games since.

And again, apologies for my lack of tact and social skills.

[GreyWolfVT]

Leitz no worries. I just wish i had a better idea of what i was delving into before i asked to join. I definitely got in over my head.

[subaltari]

I was really green into what OD&D is/was, and it all seemed very confusing at the time.
I am a much better person now, and been actually reading the LBB recently

No harm can ever come from reading the Little Brown Books! CHAINMAIL too, for that matter.

[Rex]

I was really green into what OD&D is/was, and it all seemed very confusing at the time.
I am a much better person now, and been actually reading the LBB recently

No harm can ever come from reading the Little Brown Books! CHAINMAIL too, for that matter.

I agree with this. While they may not be for everyone to play, there is always something to learn.