Group 2: Discussions
- GreyWolfVT
- Wants a special title like Scott
- Posts: 33146
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:02 pm
- Location: Vermont
- Contact:
Re: Group 2: Discussions
alright so this is a setup then from my feeling if the diamonds are that crappy.
“All men did have darkness. Some wore it in the form of horns. Some bore it invisibly as rot in their souls.”
― Paul S. Kemp, Shadowbred
"If good people won’t do the hard things, evil people will always win, because evil people will do anything."
― Paul S. Kemp, Twilight Falling
DM - GreyWolf's Mystara Adventures - AD&D 2e
― Paul S. Kemp, Shadowbred
"If good people won’t do the hard things, evil people will always win, because evil people will do anything."
― Paul S. Kemp, Twilight Falling
Re: Group 2: Discussions
Hoodie explicitly said that the diamonds were fakes. The idea, presumably, is to not hand over a bunch of real diamonds to the evil egg sellers.
Honestly, I can't tell if I'm supposed to be IC suspicious of this guy because his plan doesn't make any sense, or if I'm supposed to OOC conclude that this is WotC railroading us, and we should be good sports and play along for the sake of getting the adventure started.
Honestly, I can't tell if I'm supposed to be IC suspicious of this guy because his plan doesn't make any sense, or if I'm supposed to OOC conclude that this is WotC railroading us, and we should be good sports and play along for the sake of getting the adventure started.
- Computer +1
- Ranger Lord
- Posts: 2738
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:12 pm
Re: Group 2: Discussions
Well said.Pulpatoon wrote:Hoodie explicitly said that the diamonds were fakes. The idea, presumably, is to not hand over a bunch of real diamonds to the evil egg sellers.
Honestly, I can't tell if I'm supposed to be IC suspicious of this guy because his plan doesn't make any sense, or if I'm supposed to OOC conclude that this is WotC railroading us, and we should be good sports and play along for the sake of getting the adventure started.
Re: Group 2: Discussions
Pulpatoon wrote:Honestly, I can't tell if I'm supposed to be IC suspicious of this guy because his plan doesn't make any sense, or if I'm supposed to OOC conclude that this is WotC railroading us, and we should be good sports and play along for the sake of getting the adventure started.
You guys are welcome to not participate.Computer +1 wrote:Well said.
Re: Group 2: Discussions
Sorry, Dave. I don't mean to be dumping on something you're putting a lot of work into—and I am genuinely excited about this campaign. My previous message came off as rude, and I should have found a better way to express my thoughts.
You warned us that the adventure-as-written could be rail-roady, and it is a little hard to figure out how to position ourselves relative to that. I genuinely don't know how suspicious I'm supposed to be of this guy. My own inclinations would be to not go along with his plan, but I don't want to spoil the game if the assumption is that we do.
I guess this is the heart of the question: Would it have messed up your prep up if we had blown this guy off? How off-the-rails do you want this campaign to get?
You warned us that the adventure-as-written could be rail-roady, and it is a little hard to figure out how to position ourselves relative to that. I genuinely don't know how suspicious I'm supposed to be of this guy. My own inclinations would be to not go along with his plan, but I don't want to spoil the game if the assumption is that we do.
I guess this is the heart of the question: Would it have messed up your prep up if we had blown this guy off? How off-the-rails do you want this campaign to get?
Re: Group 2: Discussions
I appreciate this.Pulpatoon wrote:Sorry, Dave. I don't mean to be dumping on something you're putting a lot of work into—and I am genuinely excited about this campaign. My previous message came off as rude, and I should have found a better way to express my thoughts.
You warned us that the adventure-as-written could be rail-roady, and it is a little hard to figure out how to position ourselves relative to that. I genuinely don't know how suspicious I'm supposed to be of this guy. My own inclinations would be to not go along with his plan, but I don't want to spoil the game if the assumption is that we do.
But you're absolutely right.
I been mulling over the start of this game, and I have regrets. I don't regret including the situation both groups are currently facing, but the whole hooded stranger and rushed meeting part was a mistake. This short scenario is actually a different published adventure, written for organized play, and is meant to be accomplished in a single one hour session.
The hooded stranger and rushed meeting aspects are in place to fit this one hour session requirement of organized play, but should not have played a factor in this game. That part should have been scrapped, or at least revised.
That's what I get for launching the game before I was ready.
To this point:
Feel free to tell this hooded stranger to eff off. It definitely will not derail the game by any means.Pulpatoon wrote:I guess this is the heart of the question: Would it have messed up your prep up if we had blown this guy off? How off-the-rails do you want this campaign to get?
This little scenario was only included to get you guys a bit of experience (potentially enough to reach 2nd level) before dropping you into the actual hardcover, for reasons.
Re: Group 2: Discussions
Thanks, Dave, I'm glad we were able to talk this out amicably. And good to know that we can veer off when the spirit strikes!
- GreyWolfVT
- Wants a special title like Scott
- Posts: 33146
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:02 pm
- Location: Vermont
- Contact:
Re: Group 2: Discussions
I'm for going through with it but i have a feeling the seller of the egg will likely notice the fakes if they are so easily spotted most merchants don't just accept payment without checking it or at least seeing it. Either way likely we will find some sort of battle which is fine by me and Grimbul would be entirely up for it, so long as he doesn't end up in jail.
“All men did have darkness. Some wore it in the form of horns. Some bore it invisibly as rot in their souls.”
― Paul S. Kemp, Shadowbred
"If good people won’t do the hard things, evil people will always win, because evil people will do anything."
― Paul S. Kemp, Twilight Falling
DM - GreyWolf's Mystara Adventures - AD&D 2e
― Paul S. Kemp, Shadowbred
"If good people won’t do the hard things, evil people will always win, because evil people will do anything."
― Paul S. Kemp, Twilight Falling
- Computer +1
- Ranger Lord
- Posts: 2738
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:12 pm
Re: Group 2: Discussions
Hey Dave, same for me as above, I am sorry if my echoing came off as rude.
I dont like the feeling of being rushed into things but I have faith in you and the story you have planned. Again, sorry if it came out wrong.
I dont like the feeling of being rushed into things but I have faith in you and the story you have planned. Again, sorry if it came out wrong.
Re: Group 2: Discussions
GreyWolfVT wrote:I'm for going through with it but i have a feeling the seller of the egg will likely notice the fakes if they are so easily spotted most merchants don't just accept payment without checking it or at least seeing it. Either way likely we will find some sort of battle which is fine by me and Grimbul would be entirely up for it, so long as he doesn't end up in jail.
They already passed your dwarven inspection, here:GreyWolfVT wrote:"...but I have me doubts that these will pass any inspection by the merchant, I aint never met one that didn't at least give the payment a check to ensure it was authentic.
dmw71 wrote:"The merchant had a sack of diamonds which he was going to use for the purchase. We've kept those, but here --" he says, handing Grimbul a sack filled with what appear to be diamonds. "Tell me if those won't pass as real?" While they're near worthless in actual value, they will almost certainly pass for the real thing.
Re: Group 2: Discussions
Definitely no worries.Computer +1 wrote:Hey Dave, same for me as above, I am sorry if my echoing came off as rude.
I dont like the feeling of being rushed into things but I have faith in you and the story you have planned. Again, sorry if it came out wrong.
I still find starting a game, and developing the pacing and rhythm for a new group of players, to be challenging. Now that the game is actually in progress, I'm sure we'll quickly fall into a routine and things will flow more naturally.
My biggest mistake was not thinking through the time aspect of this side adventure I presented first. With everyone sitting at a table in an organized game, knowing they have a single hour to complete something -- it's easier to make forced situations like that to "work." I'm sure, if I had completely skipped the stranger pitching the idea, the story wouldn't have gotten off to such a rocky start.
We'll recover.
- GreyWolfVT
- Wants a special title like Scott
- Posts: 33146
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:02 pm
- Location: Vermont
- Contact:
Re: Group 2: Discussions
To clarify by saying merchant i am talking the one selling us the egg not the dude that gave us the fake diamonds.
“All men did have darkness. Some wore it in the form of horns. Some bore it invisibly as rot in their souls.”
― Paul S. Kemp, Shadowbred
"If good people won’t do the hard things, evil people will always win, because evil people will do anything."
― Paul S. Kemp, Twilight Falling
DM - GreyWolf's Mystara Adventures - AD&D 2e
― Paul S. Kemp, Shadowbred
"If good people won’t do the hard things, evil people will always win, because evil people will do anything."
― Paul S. Kemp, Twilight Falling
Re: Group 2: Discussions
Right. But, if you're a dwarf and your initial inspection couldn't tell they were fake...GreyWolfVT wrote:To clarify by saying merchant i am talking the one selling us the egg not the dude that gave us the fake diamonds.
Just saying.
- Scott308
- Guy Who Gamed With The Famous People
- Posts: 7141
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 3:13 am
- Location: Oregon, WI
Re: Group 2: Discussions
Just because they are merchants does not automatically mean they will be able to recognize fake diamonds. They would likely need proficiency with the Jeweler's Tools or have some ability to appraise things. It's gonna be really funny when we get to the meeting and discover the group with the egg includes a Tabaxi barbarian, a druid, an elf fighter...
Sometimes this summer I will most likely be participating in another 24 hour game of Dungeons & Dragons as part of Extra Life. This organization uses gaming to help raise money to donate to children's hospitals. I'm raising money for Marshfield Children's Hospital in Marshfield, WI, and all money I raise will go to that hospital. All donations are tax-deductible. Please take a moment to check out my donation page below. Thank you.
https://www.extra-life.org/participant/Scott Peterson
https://www.extra-life.org/participant/Scott Peterson
Re: Group 2: Discussions
I'd had the same thought!Scott308 wrote:It's gonna be really funny when we get to the meeting and discover the group with the egg includes a Tabaxi barbarian, a druid, an elf fighter...
- GreyWolfVT
- Wants a special title like Scott
- Posts: 33146
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:02 pm
- Location: Vermont
- Contact:
Re: Group 2: Discussions
That would be interesting lol
Alright well anyway lets just do it.
Alright well anyway lets just do it.
“All men did have darkness. Some wore it in the form of horns. Some bore it invisibly as rot in their souls.”
― Paul S. Kemp, Shadowbred
"If good people won’t do the hard things, evil people will always win, because evil people will do anything."
― Paul S. Kemp, Twilight Falling
DM - GreyWolf's Mystara Adventures - AD&D 2e
― Paul S. Kemp, Shadowbred
"If good people won’t do the hard things, evil people will always win, because evil people will do anything."
― Paul S. Kemp, Twilight Falling
-
- Pathfinder
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 6:11 am
- Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Re: Group 2: Discussions
Nice work to this latest update, guys.
By the way, I took the day off work tomorrow to run a bunch of errands, so my availability will be questionable, but if I miss tomorrow (Friday), you can certainly expect an update over the weekend.
By the way, I took the day off work tomorrow to run a bunch of errands, so my availability will be questionable, but if I miss tomorrow (Friday), you can certainly expect an update over the weekend.
-
- Pathfinder
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 6:11 am
- Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Re: Group 2: Discussions
Tabaxi Rogue****
Edit: ooooh the other group lol. I’ve never seen another Tabaxi in these lands. Adventuring Tabaxi’s are quite independent until going back home where we spend our years of retirement sharing all of the knowledge we learned.
Edit: ooooh the other group lol. I’ve never seen another Tabaxi in these lands. Adventuring Tabaxi’s are quite independent until going back home where we spend our years of retirement sharing all of the knowledge we learned.
Re: Group 2: Discussions
Okay, here's the situation:
This is a textbook example of a contest.
Since it was unexpected and no rolls were provided, I made the rolls myself in an effort to keep the game moving.
However....
In this case, I think I will wait one day for the players involved to make their own rolls. I'm thinking straight Dexterity rolls --
versus the individual efforts of both:
High roll wins.
In the event the rolls necessary to resolve are not provided by tomorrow, my roll will be used:
- One player says they're attempting to do something.
- Another player (or players) attempts to stop that player.
This is a textbook example of a contest.
Since it was unexpected and no rolls were provided, I made the rolls myself in an effort to keep the game moving.
However....
In this case, I think I will wait one day for the players involved to make their own rolls. I'm thinking straight Dexterity rolls --
- Grimbul (+1)
versus the individual efforts of both:
- Dureau (+2)
Kañ-Demir (+2)
High roll wins.
In the event the rolls necessary to resolve are not provided by tomorrow, my roll will be used: