Page 4 of 82

Re: OOC

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2019 7:17 pm
by sulldawga
Proposal:

We have one dead Ranger, one wounded Ranger, and two wounded footmen. Leaves us 36 mercs plus 3 Lieutenants.

Four 2-hour night watch shifts. Three of the four shifts, there will be a Lieutenant on duty with nine mercs. The fourth shift, there's just the nine mercs so we need a PC to help out.

Telemachus would like to skip night watch so he can get a full night's sleep and recover his spent Sleep spell.

Re: OOC

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2019 8:26 pm
by shaidar
Newton needs his sleep to cover his CLW spell

Re: OOC

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2019 8:36 pm
by shaidar
so we need a flat 8 hours min sleep to get any spells back?

Re: OOC

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2019 8:39 pm
by thirdkingdom
shaidar wrote:so we need a flat 8 hours min sleep to get any spells back?
Yup.

Re: OOC

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2019 8:41 pm
by shaidar
just checking.

that be fun with 3 of the 5 of us being spellcasters. Thank goodness for retainers.

Re: OOC

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2019 8:51 pm
by VonAlric
Gardo will do a round with the watch.

Re: OOC

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 12:59 pm
by Pulpatoon
Aldus and Wulka can take a round of watch, too, although we also have all these mercs who can do this sort of duty.

Regarding formatting: I know thirdkingdom prefers grammatical indication of dialog over the use of font color. I'm in the habit of using both. Is this okay? Or do you actively not want us to use font colors (I believe some people have legibility issues with them)?

Re: OOC

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:29 pm
by thirdkingdom
Pulpatoon wrote:Aldus and Wulka can take a round of watch, too, although we also have all these mercs who can do this sort of duty.

Regarding formatting: I know thirdkingdom prefers grammatical indication of dialog over the use of font color. I'm in the habit of using both. Is this okay? Or do you actively not want us to use font colors (I believe some people have legibility issues with them)?
I find the colored text difficult to read. However, this is not a hill I'm willing to die on. I understand I'm in the minority.

Re: OOC

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:37 pm
by shaidar
oops, I missed that, sorry. I shall henceforth refrain from using color for dialogue.

Re: OOC

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:46 pm
by Pulpatoon
thirdkingdom wrote:I find the colored text difficult to read. However, this is not a hill I'm willing to die on. I understand I'm in the minority.
I'll do my best to remember, but I'm sure I'll slip up now and again!

Re: OOC

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:07 pm
by VonAlric
It honestly depends on how I see the GM and other players do things. If anything, I would try to color only inner thoughts (not something that Gardo is going to do often) and leave the rest as it.

Re: OOC

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 9:36 pm
by thirdkingdom
If you guys are going to hunt bees let me know how you're going to go about it. The bees seemed to come from the south (i.e. not from the hex you've started to explore).

Re: OOC

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 11:24 pm
by sulldawga
I'd rather finish sweeping the first hex. The bees can wait another day or two.

Re: OOC

Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 1:19 am
by VonAlric
Gotcha. Finish up with the subhexes in the hex north of the road. So we would be hitting 0306,0407,0506,0607, & 0706 and above, correct?

Re: OOC

Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 1:26 am
by thirdkingdom
VonAlric wrote:Gotcha. Finish up with the subhexes in the hex north of the road. So we would be hitting 0306,0407,0506,0607, & 0706 and above, correct?
Essentially, yes, unless you want to propose a different order, but typically I'm going to assume you sweep back and forth across a hex.

Re: OOC

Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 1:36 am
by Pulpatoon
Okey-doke.

Re: OOC

Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 3:22 am
by sulldawga
Wait a second. You guys are agreeing with me in OOC and disagreeing in IC. Which hex are we doing next?

Re: OOC

Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 8:08 am
by shaidar
I'm happy either way, hunting bees or not.

Re: OOC

Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 11:49 am
by Pulpatoon
sulldawga wrote:Wait a second. You guys are agreeing with me in OOC and disagreeing in IC. Which hex are we doing next?

I don't think anybody was disagreeing with you. We proposed a course of action, and you proposed a different course of action. Apparently none of us felt strongly about our stated position, so we were happy to go along with yours, should you feel more strongly about it.

Which is not to say that I'm incapable of ooc'ing disagreeing with my character's ic plans.

Re: OOC

Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 12:03 pm
by thirdkingdom
Pulpatoon wrote:
sulldawga wrote:Wait a second. You guys are agreeing with me in OOC and disagreeing in IC. Which hex are we doing next?

I don't think anybody was disagreeing with you. We proposed a course of action, and you proposed a different course of action. Apparently none of us felt strongly about our stated position, so we were happy to go along with yours, should you feel more strongly about it.

Which is not to say that I'm incapable of ooc'ing disagreeing with my character's ic plans.
The problem is, though, that it's realy difficult for me, as GM, to parse what the intended course of action to be. I *want* you guys to feel strongly about your proposed actions, to *have* an opinion on what you want to do, and to reach a consensus on that course of action, or at least a majority. I *think* you've decided to ignore the bees for now, but am not positive.