Well if we are playing btb old school PHB you need two 15s at least to make a viable character.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 8:58 pm
by Nuke66
Good point! ruling? Honestly, I have skipped over the detail so many times, I didn't even remember.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:17 pm
by OGRE MAGE
I'm not sure what you're asking for.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:28 pm
by Nuke66
as Scott said, the BtB is:
Furthermore, it is usually essential to the
character's survival to be exceptional (with a rating of 15 or above) in no
fewer than two ability characteristics.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 11:57 pm
by OGRE MAGE
I see that this is going well already...... please correct me if I am misunderstanding you but.....
Are you asking me if you can go with the 72 instead, now that your rolls weren't what you hoped for?
Since we already discussed this and determined that you couldn't do that, what would you like me to say about it now?
Nuke66 wrote: maybe roll first, then take the 72 points if you get screwed by your roll? Please? Sorry. If I do that for you, I would have to do it for everyone. Some players already have their characters turned in.
I'm sure I'll end up regretting this but.....
Tell you what......take the 66 that you rolled and divide it any way that you want. That will give you enough for your 2-15s and more.
That's the best I'm gonna do.
Please don't ask me for special favors after we have already discussed the rules. If you want to play a barbarian, you will have to do it in someone else's game. If you want to complain about the way the game is being run, you can do that in someone else's game as well.
Nuke66 wrote: I still am not quite sure why the UA classes are out, I doubt anyone would be interested in a Cavalier, so the Barbarian is the only real addition.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:09 am
by Nuke66
No problem, I'll play them as I rolled them, don't wanna ruffle any feathers. I just thought we were having a dialogue, didn't mean for it to sound like I was asking for any special favors. Like I said, I have breezed by the BtB rule more times than I want to admit. My interpretation of the BtB rule would be a re-roll, but don't worry about it, I'll play what I rolled.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 11:58 am
by OGRE MAGE
Nothing has been ruffled as of yet.
In fact, now that I reread my post, it sounds far more tyrannical than intended.
I totally agree with you that your initial rolls are somewhat unplayable. (especially for this game) However, I am also trying to avoid falling into the trap of allowing players to make multiple rolls until they get what they want.
Since I won't allow players to re-roll 20 times, all I can do instead is strongly encourage you to use your 66 points to make up a more playable character.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 4:30 pm
by Nuke66
Alright, we have and Elven Magic User/Thief. More details to come
Re: Next Game
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 7:02 pm
by tkrexx
With Scouring of the Shire wrapping up, I'll be able to join this game. Thanks for running it, OM.
Exactly this!
I'll give this a second go over in a while.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 10:40 pm
by OGRE MAGE
Storm11 wrote:It's still a work in progress but almost there. Still have to figure out his weight, his encumberance and his saving throws and put a picture up.
I am slowly going through the sheets as they come in.
Minimum Con for a Half-orc is 13. Yours is at 9.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 3:09 am
by tkrexx
I feel kinda guilty about this, Nuke. Stats appear as rolled.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 8:25 am
by Storm11
OGRE MAGE wrote:
Storm11 wrote:It's still a work in progress but almost there. Still have to figure out his weight, his encumberance and his saving throws and put a picture up.
I am slowly going through the sheets as they come in.
Minimum Con for a Half-orc is 13. Yours is at 9.
Oo yes I didn't see that. I could swap the Dex to 8 and have an 18 constitution I guess.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 1:59 pm
by Nuke66
tkrexx wrote:I feel kinda guilty about this, Nuke. Stats appear as rolled.
Nice, don't feel guilty, we might have a ranger after all
Re: Next Game
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:07 pm
by OGRE MAGE
Looking good so far guys.
I am getting a lot of interest in this game from other players as well so.......
I think we will easily have more than one group running at a time.
I just got conformation on a new thread coming very soon.
I will populate that with more info as soon as its up.
Again, thanks for the interest and stay tuned.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:20 pm
by tkrexx
The PC I rolled could literally be anything, so I'll wait til everyone else has a class in mind before I make a solid call.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 9:57 pm
by Inferno
Happy new year, all.
Fyi, I've moved off 'boy thief' onto 'boy archer,' probably an Elven F or F/MU.
Work in Progress sheet to come.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:35 pm
by Inferno
Jack in the Green.jpg (78.67 KiB) Viewed 900 times
Re: Next Game
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:17 am
by Nuke66
Well, just took the thief class and elf race specifically for the bow bonus. But no problem. Multiple arrows are a good thing. The occasional spell will help too.
Re: Next Game
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:22 am
by Inferno
Sorry Nuke. I thought that in AD&D 1e, thieves can't use bows.