OOC Thread

Message
Author
User avatar
acererak
Tracker
Tracker
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: NY,NY

OOC Thread

#1 Post by acererak »

Welcome everybody, this is the OOC thread. The campaign ID number is 72. So far we have 5 PCs by my count. Good number to start with.

User avatar
dmw71
POWAH!
POWAH!
Posts: 19605
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:18 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

#2 Post by dmw71 »

acererak wrote:Welcome everybody, this is the OOC thread. The campaign ID number is 72. So far we have 5 PCs by my count. Good number to start with.
Just to clarify, are you using an OSRIC set (e.g. Labyrinth Lord) or the official B/X rulebooks?
-- Project --
Playtest: Untitled Project (1e)
-- DM --
Greyhawk Campaign: Sandbox (1e)
(Status: Archived)

User avatar
acererak
Tracker
Tracker
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: NY,NY

Re: OOC Thread

#3 Post by acererak »

I am going to use B/X assuming everyone has access to that rule set.

User avatar
dmw71
POWAH!
POWAH!
Posts: 19605
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:18 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

#4 Post by dmw71 »

acererak wrote:I am going to use B/X assuming everyone has access to that rule set.
Cool.

I've shared the PDFs of B/X, BECMI and Rules Cyclopedia with anyone that doesn't have access to them here:

viewtopic.php?f=21&t=560#p10690
-- Project --
Playtest: Untitled Project (1e)
-- DM --
Greyhawk Campaign: Sandbox (1e)
(Status: Archived)

User avatar
Distorted Humor
Ranger Knight
Ranger Knight
Posts: 1260
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 1:23 pm

Re: OOC Thread

#5 Post by Distorted Humor »

B/X it is, thanks for uploading the rulebook dmw71

User avatar
Alethan
POWAH!
POWAH!
Posts: 14356
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:50 pm
Location: Midwest
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

#6 Post by Alethan »

dmw71 wrote:
acererak wrote:Welcome everybody, this is the OOC thread. The campaign ID number is 72. So far we have 5 PCs by my count. Good number to start with.
Just to clarify, are you using an OSRIC set (e.g. Labyrinth Lord) or the official B/X rulebooks?

OSRIC <> Labyrinth Lords

OSRIC is basically a clone of 1e while Labyrinth Lords is basically a clone of B/X.
Dragon foot. Bamboo pole. Little mouse. Tiny boy.

User avatar
dmw71
POWAH!
POWAH!
Posts: 19605
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:18 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

#7 Post by dmw71 »

Alethan wrote: OSRIC <> Labyrinth Lords

OSRIC is basically a clone of 1e while Labyrinth Lords is basically a clone of B/X.
My mistake. Substitute OGL for OSRIC. It, the Open Game License, is what is enabling all these clones to be produced. Thank you Wizards of the Coast!
-- Project --
Playtest: Untitled Project (1e)
-- DM --
Greyhawk Campaign: Sandbox (1e)
(Status: Archived)

User avatar
Alethan
POWAH!
POWAH!
Posts: 14356
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:50 pm
Location: Midwest
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

#8 Post by Alethan »

Ah! Gotcha.
Dragon foot. Bamboo pole. Little mouse. Tiny boy.

User avatar
Distorted Humor
Ranger Knight
Ranger Knight
Posts: 1260
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 1:23 pm

Re: OOC Thread

#9 Post by Distorted Humor »

Well I guess we have a Cleric named Atticus

Stats: STR:11, INT:11, WIS:14, DEX:10, CON:14, CHR:14

Will flesh him out in a bit.

User avatar
dmw71
POWAH!
POWAH!
Posts: 19605
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:18 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

#10 Post by dmw71 »

Distorted Humor wrote:Well I guess we have a Cleric named Atticus
"Atticus!" "Atticus!" "Atticus!"

As far as clerics are concerned, the more the merrier! ;) Although, if memory serves, don't clerics in B/X need to wait until they're second level to get their first spell? That would be the only downside.
-- Project --
Playtest: Untitled Project (1e)
-- DM --
Greyhawk Campaign: Sandbox (1e)
(Status: Archived)

User avatar
Alethan
POWAH!
POWAH!
Posts: 14356
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:50 pm
Location: Midwest
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

#11 Post by Alethan »

dmw71 wrote:... if memory serves...
You sound like the guy from Iron Chef...

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Iron_Chef
Dragon foot. Bamboo pole. Little mouse. Tiny boy.


User avatar
dmw71
POWAH!
POWAH!
Posts: 19605
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:18 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

#13 Post by dmw71 »

Alethan wrote:
dmw71 wrote:... if memory serves...
You sound like the guy from Iron Chef...

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Iron_Chef
LOL

I'm more of a Chopped fan myself. :D
-- Project --
Playtest: Untitled Project (1e)
-- DM --
Greyhawk Campaign: Sandbox (1e)
(Status: Archived)

User avatar
Alethan
POWAH!
POWAH!
Posts: 14356
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:50 pm
Location: Midwest
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

#14 Post by Alethan »

dmw71 wrote:As far as clerics are concerned, the more the merrier! ;) Although, if memory serves, don't clerics in B/X need to wait until they're second level to get their first spell? That would be the only downside.
(Sorry, forgot to make my real point...)

In LL, clerics DO get one spell at first level... one of the reasons why I like LL just a LITTLE better than B/X. I never did understand the reason for withholding spells at first level for the cleric.
Dragon foot. Bamboo pole. Little mouse. Tiny boy.

Xaxyx
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: OOC Thread

#15 Post by Xaxyx »

I suppose the reasoning was that clerics already get a "special power" at first level -- Turn Undead. Magic-users, on the other hand, have nothing going for them but their spells.

Elves are the one true "multi-class" character in B/X, as reflected by their extreme experience point chart. Thus, they gain the full advantages of both class progressions.

saalaria
Ranger Lord
Ranger Lord
Posts: 2517
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:07 am
Location: London

Re: OOC Thread

#16 Post by saalaria »


User avatar
dmw71
POWAH!
POWAH!
Posts: 19605
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:18 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

#17 Post by dmw71 »

Wow, nice stats. I'll be interested in seeing what you decide to play.
-- Project --
Playtest: Untitled Project (1e)
-- DM --
Greyhawk Campaign: Sandbox (1e)
(Status: Archived)

saalaria
Ranger Lord
Ranger Lord
Posts: 2517
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:07 am
Location: London

Re: OOC Thread

#18 Post by saalaria »

Why don't we all try and play clerics? Your comment about more the merrier made me laugh...and got me thinking!

User avatar
dmw71
POWAH!
POWAH!
Posts: 19605
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:18 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

#19 Post by dmw71 »

saalaria wrote:Why don't we all try and play clerics? Your comment about more the merrier made me laugh...and got me thinking!
LOL.... I could do it with a 15 wisdom.

Anyone else in? ;)
-- Project --
Playtest: Untitled Project (1e)
-- DM --
Greyhawk Campaign: Sandbox (1e)
(Status: Archived)

saalaria
Ranger Lord
Ranger Lord
Posts: 2517
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:07 am
Location: London

Re: OOC Thread

#20 Post by saalaria »

A roving band of proselytisers - seeking converts everywhere. Fighting the good fight against evil wherever it festers...its got legs I tell ya!
As an aside - anyone ever played in a campaign of one class? I haven't but it could be interesting for a change (don't worry ace: not seriously suggesting it for yours!)

Post Reply

Return to “Tomb of the Iron God”